Possession of Cocaine: Reform of Drug Sentencing Inequities Could Come in 2010

For more than 20 years, federal law has imposed much harsher penalties on those convicted of crimes involving crack cocaine than those convicted of similar crimes involving powdered cocaine. Currently, it takes 100 times more powdered cocaine than crack cocaine to trigger the same mandatory minimum sentences.

For example, possession of five grams of crack cocaine carries a five-year mandatory minimum sentence. To receive the same five-year mandatory minimum sentence for powdered cocaine possession, an individual must have 500 grams in his or her possession. Likewise, while there is a 10-year mandatory minimum sentence imposed for possession of 50 grams of crack cocaine, a person would have to have 5000 grams of powdered cocaine in their possession to receive the same 10-year sentence.

In recent years, the US Sentencing Commission, the Department of Justice, the White House and civil rights groups all have called for congressional action to fix this disparity. But despite several attempts by Congress to change the law, the sentencing disparity continues to exist.

Last October, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) introduced the Fair Sentencing Act of 2009 (S. 1789). This bill aims to equalize sentencing between crack cocaine and powdered cocaine convictions by decreasing the mandatory minimum sentences for crack cocaine convictions to those currently imposed for powdered cocaine convictions. The bill also would eliminate the five year mandatory minimum sentence for simple crack cocaine possession; crack cocaine is currently the only drug to carry any mandatory sentence for simple possession.

A similar bill was introduced in the House of Representatives last July. The Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009 (H.R. 3245) passed committee vote at the end of July, but then was pushed to the back burner as the health care reform debate heated up.

The current drug sentencing laws date back to the passage of the Anti-Drug Abuse Acts in the late 1980s. There was significant media attention on the national drug problem in that era, particularly on the epidemic of crack cocaine use and resulting violence in the inner cities. The Anti-Drug Abuse Acts were supposed to address this problem by increasing the penalties for drug crimes and targeting high-ranking members in the drug trade. Instead, the law resulted in much harsher penalties that targeted low-level offenders, particularly African-American males.

The penalties for crack cocaine offenses were made much more stringent than those for the powdered version based on several misconceptions about the differences between the two forms of the drug. These misconceptions included the belief that crack cocaine was a much more addictive drug than powdered cocaine and that those using crack cocaine were prone to more violent behavior.

However, later medical and scientific research has proved both of these beliefs to be untrue. There is no difference in the physiological and psychotropic effects of either drug — they have been found to be pharmacologically the same and to have the same effects on brain chemistry after ingestion.

Thus, all of the justifications that existed in the late 1980s to impose different sentencing structures based on which form of cocaine was involved in the crime have lost their merit, leaving no true reason for the disparity other than the inability of Congress to take effective action to change it.

Since 2001, Congress has made repeated attempts to reduce or eliminate the sentencing disparity between cocaine crimes. That year, the Drug Sentencing Reform Act was introduced. If passed, the law would have increased the amount of crack cocaine needed to trigger the mandatory minimum five-year sentence from 5 grams to 20 grams.

In 2007, several more bills were introduced to address the sentencing disparity. One bill would have raised the trigger amount of crack cocaine from 5 grams to 25 grams for a mandatory five year minimum sentence. A second bill sought to eliminate the disparity altogether by raising the trigger amounts of crack cocaine for any mandatory minimum sentence to the same amounts required for powdered cocaine. None of these efforts, however, were successful.

Nevertheless, many commentators believe that 2010 may be the year that Congress actually manages to pass a bill eliminating the sentencing disparity. It appears that the bill has garnered enough support on both sides of the aisle, across all branches of the federal government and from the public to finally become a reality instead of a campaign promise.

The financial pressures currently faced by the federal government due to the poor economy and growing national deficit also may be a contributing factor tipping the scales in favor of changing the sentencing laws. At least half of all federal inmates are serving time for drug offenses. Of those serving time for crack cocaine offenses, more than 60 percent are low-level offenders. By changing the federal sentencing laws, it is possible that future low-level offenders will receive probation or shorter prison terms than currently imposed, which means fewer federal tax dollars will have to be spent on their incarceration.

However, even though there has developed a strong consensus that these laws need to be changed, there is still debate over what form this change should take. While the Fair Sentencing Act seeks to lower the penalties for crack cocaine offenses, others believe that a more appropriate way to address the disparity is by increasing the penalties for powdered cocaine.

There also is debate over whether the change in sentencing should be made retroactive and, if so, how far back it should apply. Those in opposition to any retroactivity are concerned that it will create a logistics nightmare for the court system and Justice Department to process the anticipated flood of requests.

US sentencing laws for crack cocaine and powdered cocaine offenses are patently unfair. The rationales relied upon by Congress at the time these laws were passed have been proven to be meritless, and the laws have resulted in unequal treatment of African-American offenders, who currently serve nearly as much time in prison on average for drug offenses as white offenders do for violent crimes.

Unfortunately, Congress is the only body that can change the law and end the sentencing disparity once and for all. Although past efforts have fallen short, many are optimistic that current efforts will succeed where past efforts have failed.

Article provided by Roberts Law Group, PLLC
Criminal Lawyers, Raleigh, NC

Attorney Patrick Roberts is a former prosecutor, now criminal lawyer in Raleigh who defends persons accused of drug crimes in state and federal courts throughout North Carolina. To learn more about Mr. Roberts and his firm please visit www.robertslawteam.com.

Possession Of Cocaine: 9/11 a day of….Jeff Hardy Arrested ??!!



September 11, 2009 Sheriff Lane Carter reports the arrest of an individual on charges of trafficking in controlled prescription pills, and possession of anabolic steroids. Sheriff Carter reported a joint investigation conducted by officers from the Moore County Sheriffs Office Narcotics Unit, Moore County Sheriffs Office Select Enforcement Unit, and Fayetteville Police Department led to the arrest. Officers executed a search warrant at a residence located at [Address Deleted by PWInsider.com] near Cameron, North Carolina. During the search officers located and seized approximately 262 Vicodin prescription pills, 180 Soma prescription pills ( Somas are non-controlled prescription pills), 555 milliliters of anabolic steroids, a residual amount of powder cocaine, and items of drug paraphernalia. Vicodin and anabolic steroids are included in Schedule III within the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act. The estimated street value of the drugs seized is 00.00. Arrested was: Jeffrey Nero Hardy 32 years of age [address deleted] Cameron, North Carolina Jeffrey Nero Hardy was arrested on September 11, 2009 and charged with felony trafficking in opium, two counts of felony possession with intent to sell or deliver a Schedule III controlled substance, felony maintaining a dwelling to keep controlled substance, felony possession of cocaine, and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia. Jeffrey Nero Hardy received a 5000.00 secured bond and was placed in the Moore County

Possession Of Cocaine: LSP: 19 pounds of cocaine found during I-10 traffic stop near Jennings
Louisiana State Police discover 19 pounds of cocaine in a vehicle during a traffic stop on I-10 near Jennings on Wednesday.
Read more on Southwest Daily News



Possession Of Cocaine: State drug agents charge York man with cocaine possession in Erie
A York man suspected of supplying drugs to a trafficking ring that state drug investigators said they shut down in Erie in 2009 is in jail on charges of possessing a large amount of cocaine.
Read more on Erie Times-News

Related Possession Of Cocaine Information…

18 Responses to “Possession of Cocaine: Reform of Drug Sentencing Inequities Could Come in 2010”

  • DXHardyBoyzFan:

    lol DAMN!

  • mbrooksslp:

    out of jail

  • Deidera360:

    he defiantly not coming back to the wwe

  • lilsouthernbitch:

    jeff was gettin high 4 the people of 9 11 an they arrested him u fuckin pigs deserve 2 die an u r haters drugs will always b here no matter wat u do so y did u do it 2 him huh give me a answer he waz probaley pourin liqure 4 the fallen 2 i say r.i.p people of 911 an jeff hardy was doin a special tribute

  • techn9ne122089:

    @Mysterious34 i dont like him any more your right

  • Mysterious34:

    @hardyXtreme1000 What I recall a mistake is once or twice, if that’s the case Drug Hardy has made at least 5, yes FIVE MISTAKES in his past years and that’s a shame. People can use their bailout money on a new car perhaps, instead of using it on a guy who obviously loves prison in-mates. He don’t make mistakes anymore he makes CHOICES.

  • Mysterious34:

    @techn9ne122089 Well I don’t know if your a Jeff “Drug” Hardy fan but for your age I’ll say you should stop looking up to him as a rolemodel. I’m just saying it’s your choice if you want to stop. The only answer to drugs is NO.

  • Mysterious34:

    @AnnieCandiceYu Sad thing is that Matt keeps wasting his money bailing his so called ‘brother’. Matt has told Jeff to stop once before and Jeff is even too young to know what stop means. Matt next time use that money on a new car or house because its obvious Jeff likes in-mates.

  • darkshadowkiller117:

    @juvijuice89 he looks like my dad but with out shaved eyebrows and with out long hair sort of

  • Jillacam:

    faarooq a be waiting for you

  • ianniere619:

    @theolliep123 hes in tna now

  • juvijuice89:

    well ladies, for all of u that constantly say “he’s sooooo hot”, let me ask u somethin, does he look hot in a mugshot? lol

  • cpmstudios98:

    Shit i need more flowers for that day now

  • pedr0henrique02:

    i stil lov him

  • BenMc147:

    DAMN!

  • gunsnroses454:

    it out for one year dude 3 strikes the things says one year he might be out and in jail after march you never know. and people have problems so yep

  • GOllumboy101:

    1 word.

    DAMN!

  • theolliep123:

    he could be in jail?????