Fingerprint Evidence?
Question by A.Harper20: Fingerprint evidence?
Can fingerprint evidence be used in a case against someone .if another party already claimed possession of a drug bag?
Best answer:
Answer by Russ
Yes.
Answer by Chase Kust
If the DA wants to prosecute all that was involved with the case then they will most definitely use prints to help build their case. Which fingerprints are the most use and strongest evidence of cases. You cant say you didn’t touch the bag or that you didn’t know about it if your prints are on it
'Vultures' claim by ex-bank boss facing drugs charges
"Following a review of the evidence, I have concluded that there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to charge Paul Flowers with possession of Class A and Class C drugs relating to an incident on November 9, 2013." Tweet this …
Read more on Nottingham Post
Sentencing won't fix heroin woes
That's certainly been the case for a Gulf Coast neighbor: Despite Florida's harsh mandatory minimums for heroin possession and distribution, deaths caused by heroin increased 89.5 percent in 2012, just one year after Florida began cracking down on …
Read more on Shreveport Times
The Commentators above me are partially correct..
BUT
fingerprints; photos; videos; audio forms of evidence are SIMPLY Circumstantial Evidence
which means
WITHOUT….the testimony of a 3rd party impartial witness to their ( or even YOUR) claims of ANY wrongful, negligent acts and or acts of omissions, by the You (or the cops) will Go NOWHERE !
what is Necessary to obtain a CRIMINAL (not civil) indictment / conviction is the testimony of a 3rd party impartial witness, who will SWEAR it is TRUE.
If the DA wants to prosecute
and PRESENT ANY evidence to the court
for it to be placed on the record,
it can ONLY be Put into the Record, by way of if a competent Witness,
(HE CANNOT “Tell” the court “to NOTICE the Evidence”)
excuse me I digress,,,
again, it can ONLY be Put into the Record, by way of if a competent Witness,
Who will swear to and states as a FACT that…
“YEs, that is HIS bag, I saw it in his Possession !”
not reliably it just shows you touched the bag (possibly) NOT that there were any drugs in it when you touched it, no movable item can give reliable evidence without some corroboration